Anapol Weiss has filed a class-action lawsuit against Super73 on behalf of California consumers who purchased electric vehicles that the company labeled and advertised as e-bikes. The lawsuit, led by a California mother, claims Super73 misled consumers about the legality of their vehicles as e-bikes under state law. The lead plaintiff, who bought a Super73 vehicle for her son for his twelfth birthday, later learned that the vehicle is not an e-bike under state law and cannot be operated without a driver’s license, registration, and insurance.
This case highlights the illegal conduct and deceptive marketing practices of Super73 and the harm caused to consumers who rely on accurate product information to make informed purchases.
Understanding the Case Against Super73
The lawsuit centers on the lead plaintiff’s experience with Super73:
- Misleading Marketing: The plaintiff purchased the vehicle believing it was a safe, convenient, and legal form of transportation for her son. Super73 markets and sells its vehicles as e-bikes that are compliant with state law
- Legal Limitations: After attempting to register the bike at her son’s school, she learned that the model was banned. Local authorities further informed her that the Super73 vehicle is not an e-bike due to the motor’s size and high-speed capabilities, making it illegal for riders of any age without a license, registration, and insurance.
- Consumer Impact: The plaintiff and other members of the class have been left with costly products they cannot use legally or safely.
Super73 falsely advertises and labels its vehicles as e-bikes, duping consumers into believing that the vehicles can be lawfully operated as e-bikes.
Safety and Consumer Concerns
This lawsuit brings attention to critical issues about high-speed electric vehicles that are misleadingly marketed and sold as e-bikes like those produced by Super73:
- Speed and Safety Risks: Many Super73 models can reach speeds far exceeding legal limits for e-bikes, making them more akin to motorcycles. These speeds pose risks to both riders and pedestrians.
- Rising Injury Rates: A UCSF study revealed that injuries from e-bikes have doubled in recent years, with many incidents involving minors and high-speed models.
These concerns underscore the need for manufacturers to be transparent about their products and the importance of holding companies accountable for misleading consumers.
The Class Action Lawsuit
Anapol Weiss has filed this class-action lawsuit to hold Super73 accountable for its illegal conduct and deceptive practices. The claims include:
- False Advertising: Super73 advertises its bikes as legal and compliant with state laws governing e-bikes while failing to disclose that many of their products are not actually e-bikes but rather motor vehicles requiring licensing and registration.
- Failure to Inform Consumers: The company fails to inform consumers that its vehicles cannot be lawfully operated as e-bikes.
- Consumer Harm: Class members, including the lead plaintiff, have incurred significant financial losses by purchasing bikes they cannot legally operate.
Why This Case Matters
This lawsuit addresses the harm caused by deceptive marketing practices and the financial and practical burden placed on consumers who purchase products they cannot legally use. If successful, the lawsuit could ensure greater accountability and transparency from manufacturers like Super73.
If you or a loved one purchased a Super73 or similar electric vehicle that cannot legally be used as advertised, you may be entitled to compensation. Anapol Weiss is here to help consumers fight back against deceptive practices and seek justice.
Contact Our E-Bike Lawsuit Attorneys
At Anapol Weiss, we are committed to protecting consumers’ rights and holding companies accountable. If you believe you’ve been misled about the legality or usability of your Super73 vehicle, contact our experienced e-bike lawsuit attorneys today. Click here to contact Anapol Weiss attorneys Pat Huyett or Kevin Fay.